|
Court: Enron shareholders can't proceed
2007-03-19
A federal appeals court ruled Monday that Enron Corp. shareholders cannot proceed with a class-action lawsuit against investment banks for their alleged role in the accounting fraud that led to Enron's collapse. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion reversed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Melinda Harmon in Houston, who had said shareholders could sue as a class. "As we have recognized, class certification may be the backbreaking decision that places 'insurmountable pressure' on a defendant to settle, even when the defendant has a good chance of succeeding on the merits," the 5th Circuit opinion said. The three-judge panel said it's appropriate for the court to intervene "before settlement may be coerced by an erroneous class certification decision." Shareholders' attorneys argue that Merrill Lynch & Co., Credit Suisse Group and other investment banks that did business with Enron should be held liable for billions of dollars in damages. William Lerach, an attorney for the policyholders, expressed disappointment in the 5th Circuit's ruling. "We think it is unfair and wrong under the law," he said. "The basic holding of the court is that even if the banks participated knowingly in a scheme to defraud investors in Enron's collapse, you cannot have a class action against the banks." Enron, once the nation's seventh-largest company, entered bankruptcy proceedings in December 2001 when accounting tricks could no longer hide billions of dollars in debt. The collapse wiped out thousands of jobs, more than $60 billion in market value and more than $2 billion in pension plans. Lerach said he and other shareholders' attorneys are likely to appeal Monday's ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court "as quickly as possible." A trial for the shareholders' $40 billion lawsuit was set to start next month, but Lerach said the 5th Circuit's ruling will force it to be postponed. "The judge couldn't go ahead with a trial under these circumstances," Lerach said. Merrill Lynch spokesman Mark Herr said the company is pleased with the 5th Circuit's ruling, but he declined to make further comment. Attorneys general from 30 states have sided with Enron shareholders in their bid for a class action. The Securities and Exchange Commission already has won tens of millions of dollars in settlements with Merrill, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. In 2003, Merrill agreed to pay $80 million to settle the SEC's civil charges that it participated in Enron's phony sales of floating power plants, designed to inflate the company's earnings. Four former Merrill executives were convicted of fraud and conspiracy charges in 2004 for their roles in the deal. Andrew Fastow, Enron's now-imprisoned former finance chief, testified in the shareholder litigation this fall. He acknowledged that some of the transactions Enron conducted with its investment banks created the false appearance of profits and cash flow. Along with Merrill and Credit Suisse, the other defendants in the shareholders' suit are Royal Bank of Canada, Royal Bank of Scotland and Toronto-Dominion Bank. Barclays Bank PLC also is named as a defendant in the shareholders' suit. "Barclays is very pleased with the 5th Circuit's ruling and grateful that the 5th Circuit agreed with its views," company attorney David Braff said. The attorneys general supporting the shareholders are from Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia.
Ex-NatWest bankers sentenced to 3 years in jail (2008-02-22)Ex-Enron chief Skilling seeks new trial (2007-09-07)Court: Enron shareholders can't proceed (2007-03-19)Ex-Enron CEO Skilling reports to prison (2006-12-13)Enron's Fastow assigned to La. prison (2006-11-10)
| 
